Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Becky O A's avatar

It is good to hear a real-life incident of misuse of the pulpit in favor of politics. In my experience, people in the church can be pushy to get candidates in front of congregations. Clearly in violation not only of our IRS laws but what we are called to be and do as a church. Lockstep with politicians is never a good policy.

Susan Knolan's avatar

First, and to be clear, I have a dislike of politicians showing up in a congregation during a campaign.

Second, you write as though this is a NEW phenomenon. These visitations have been happening throughout American history. I remember such visits as a child, even then thinking that it was odd.

Third, "Interrupting Worship" is a click-bait title and presents a false narrative. FBA, like most churches, has a period in the service for ANNOUNCEMENTS and the GREETING of guests. Maybe you have never been a church member, so it makes sense that it's a strange 'interruption,' as you think, and have questions. Perhaps, a little time and devotion to researching churches, the order of service, and church history would help to clear your confusion. Additionally, focusing solely on FBA makes your writing unbalanced. You should list SEVERAL churches, pastors, and candidates. (And tossing in the name of Charles Stanley, a man who left FBA in 2020 and who died in 2023, is a tired and worn practice. It's time to move on and face the present day. Let his name rest in peace.)

Fourth, it's quite rich and telling when you state "the pastor thought it proved his importance." Whose "importance?" The candidate's or the pastor's? Either way, that swipe is so biased, unnecessary, outside the scope of your argument, patently personal, and petty, that it calls into question your journalism ethics (if any are to be had). Further, it causes one to ponder if this platform is the extent and pinnacle of your writing career.

Tips: #1, Get a copy editor. #2, Stay on topic (Journalism 101).

No posts

Ready for more?